Living evidence archive
Hypothesiscurrent

Structured evidence record

The double match may warrant a preregistered corpus test

An untested statistical hypothesis, not a probability claim.

Stable recordTC-HYP-0019Modified August 26, 2026
Claim statement

The shared 1434 | 187 fingerprint may be sufficiently uncommon among comparable phrases to justify a preregistered corpus-frequency study.

HypothesisPrecision: unknown

Evidence boundary

Hypothesis boundary

A testable explanation under investigation, not established fact.

Known limitations

No eligible corpus, base frequency, complete attempt history, or corrected significance estimate is currently recorded.

What would change this?

A preregistered corpus study shows the fingerprint is common, or a complete trial history removes the apparent anomaly.

Reproducibility

Declared method

Define an eligible phrase population, normalization rules, exclusions, and complete trial history before testing a held-out corpus.

Provenance

Exact source trail

Every linked source should resolve to a stable record and an exact page, row, passage, timestamp, calculation, or media location.

Structure

Dependencies and typed relationships

Dependencies are not counted as independent confirmations. A changed input can be traced to the records that rely on it.

Change history

Visible revisions

No structured revision is linked yet. Native WordPress revisions remain preserved.