What explicit observation or counterevidence would cause the related Tony Canon interpretation to be revised, bounded further, or withdrawn?
Stable audit record
What observation would revise the recognition-signal interpretation?
A conceptual revision condition remains to be stated by the canonical source.
Stable record
TC-Q-0193Modified August 26, 2026Context before detail
This is an audit record, not a standalone article.
The reader-facing explanation lives in the topic dossier, where this question appears beside the findings, sources, timeline, and other unresolved limits.
Current answer
What the archive can say now
A conceptual revision condition remains to be stated by the canonical source.
Why it remains open
The structured record cannot invent a first-person revision condition that Tony has not stated.
What would resolve it
Tony supplies a versioned revision condition or revises the underlying interpretation.
Reproducibility
Test and review plan
Record revision conditions in the Tony Canon lane without recasting them as arithmetic consequences.
Provenance
Exact source trail
Every linked source should resolve to a stable record and an exact page, row, passage, timestamp, calculation, or media location.
Structure
Dependencies and typed relationships
Dependencies are not counted as independent confirmations. A changed input can be traced to the records that rely on it.
Change history
Visible revisions
No structured revision is linked yet. Native WordPress revisions remain preserved.