Exact VA 968 Sargon II stele from Kition identity panel
Tony Canon

Claim type: Spiritual testimony / visionary interpretation

Evidence level: Personal revelation and symbolic synthesis unless otherwise cited

This belongs to Tony Canon and is not presented as conventional third-party biography or institutional record.

Today’s exact selected artifact is Berlin VA 968, the monumental stone stele of Sargon II found at ancient Kition near modern Larnaca, Cyprus. It is edited as ORACC/RINAP Q006584, Sargon II 103. Its opening line places Aššur above the Igīgū and Anunnakū gods; later columns describe far-sea rulers, materials sent to Babylon, and the making and erection of the monument itself.

Exact VA 968 Sargon II stele from Kition identity panel
Exact selected artifact: Berlin VA 968 / ORACC Q006584, photographed in the Vorderasiatisches Museum. Photo by Osama Shukir Muhammed Amin, CC BY-SA 4.0; explanatory layout added.

Why this witness advances the corpus

The corpus has already documented creation-for-labor, temple order, law, craft, kingship, Abzu imagery, and divine command. VA 968 advances a different proof gap: does un-restored Anunnakū language occur on the same exact object as explicit long-distance sea geography, political communication, named material movement, and monument production? Yes—but grammar and surface condition impose strict limits.

The opening Anunnakū clause is a divine hierarchy title. Human rulers send goods, and Sargon commissions the stele. This article therefore tests a civilization-network hypothesis without turning proximity into agency.

Exact-object identity and visual inspection

The current ORACC/RINAP catalogue identifies Q006584 as Sargon II 103, a Neo-Assyrian stele from Larnaka. RINAP 2 identifies the museum object as VA 968, gives dimensions of 209 × 68.5 × 32–33 cm, and describes its find near ancient Kition. The Staatliche Museen/Google Arts & Culture record independently gives inventory VA 00968, Kition provenance, basalt medium, and the Berlin collection.

Two exact photographs were downloaded and opened at original resolution: a 2552×4748 full view and a 4016×6016 inscription-side view. The full view shows Sargon II holding a mace and raising his right hand before eight deity symbols. The side view shows sharply preserved cuneiform rows. These photographs establish object identity and preservation; they do not automatically make the worn, relief-obscured opening line independently decipherable.

Thesis-critical line: column i 1

Exact VA 968 line drawing with column i line 1 marked
Exact-object line alignment. VAS 1 no. 71 is labeled VA 968; the red box marks the complete opening row, not an invented sign-level photo collation.

Edition transliteration: {d}aš-šur ⸢EN GAL-ú⸣ [LUGAL? KIŠ?] {d}í-⸢gì-gì u {d}⸣A.NUN.NA.

Published RINAP translation: “The god Aššur, the great lord, [king of all] the Igīgū gods and Anunnakū gods …”.

Cautious working translation: “Aššur, the great lord, [king of the totality], of the Igīgū and Anunnakū gods …”. The royal-title restoration [LUGAL? KIŠ?] is editorial. The writing A.NUN.NA is outside square brackets; it is not supplied by a parallel or composite reconstruction.

Image-to-text hard gate

Image-to-text evidence table for VA 968 column i line 1
Image-to-text table separating exact photographs, exact line art, damaged and restored material, agency, confidence, and visual limit.

This result is exact-line-art visible, exact-photograph identity-controlled, and edition-guided. RINAP explicitly notes that column i is badly worn and traces are obscured by the relief, sometimes requiring Ungnad’s exact-object copy. Accordingly, no isolated sign box is drawn on the photograph, and the much clearer side photograph is not falsely used as though it depicted the front opening row.

Line-by-line notes

Line notes for Sargon II 103 divine hierarchy and sea network
Line notes separate the un-restored Anunnakū title, general divine-order language, sea geography, material tribute, and monument production.

Column i 1: divine hierarchy

Aššur is the grammatical center. The Anunnakū are one of the divine groups over whom his title extends. This supports an organized hierarchy but does not make the group the author or maker of the monument.

Column i 24–28: gods, kings, and order

The text calls the great gods managers of heaven and netherworld, associates their attack with conflict, and says they appoint rulers and place one land over another. This is relevant to divine decree and kingship, but it is a collective “great gods” clause—not an Anunnakū-only action.

Column iv 23–27: the Eastern Sea

The edition places Upēri, king of Dilmun, thirty leagues away in the Eastern Sea and says he sent a message of submission after hearing of Aššur, Nabû, and Marduk’s might. The passage is damaged and must remain edition-controlled.

Column iv 28–42: seven rulers across the Western Sea

Seven rulers of Yāʾ, a region of Adnana/Cyprus, are described as seven days distant in the Western Sea. They hear of Sargon’s deeds and bring gold, silver, ebony, boxwood, and the treasure of their land to Babylon. The text is royal ideology, but the geographical and material network is explicit.

Column iv 43–57: the stele itself

Sargon says he had a stele made, placed divine images and his royal image on it, wrote upon it, and had it erected. The exact restoration and location in iv 52–53 are disputed. A proposal linking the wording to “mines” is one of several rival readings and is excluded from the core claim.

Agency matrix: what the source actually assigns

Agency matrix for divine hierarchy diplomacy materials and monument work
Agency matrix: Aššur anchors divine hierarchy; human rulers conduct diplomacy and move materials; Sargon commissions the monument; the Anunnakū are not made technical actors.

Divine frame: Aššur is great lord above the Igīgū and Anunnakū. Diplomatic actors: named or numbered human rulers hear, respond, send, and submit. Material actors: human polities deliver gold, silver, woods, and treasure. Monument actor: Sargon commissions inscription and erection.

This structure supports an ancient conception in which divine hierarchy legitimates a wide political world. It does not say the Anunnakū sailed the seas, mined metals, transported goods, carved stone, or built the stele.

Conquest, contact, and caution

RINAP’s historical introduction warns that a direct Assyrian conquest or annexation of Cyprus cannot be accepted without serious reservations. Diplomatic gifts, ideological reach, and likely envoy contact are safer conclusions than military occupation. That caution matters: an evidence-led corpus should preserve the strong sea-network claim without inflating it into an unsupported conquest narrative.

What this means for the Anunnaki thesis

Support and limits of VA 968 for the Anunnaki corpus
Corpus assessment: exact-object Anunnakū hierarchy and a sea-spanning material-political network, with strict grammatical, visual, and historical limits.

Support: the exact monument preserves an un-restored Anunnakū writing within an organized divine hierarchy; the same object encodes far-sea geography, royal communication, material transfers, and monument technology. This is meaningful evidence for divine-order ideology operating across a real civilization network.

Limits: no line calls the Anunnakū extraterrestrials or credits them with navigation, mining, commerce, craft, genetic engineering, spacecraft, Nibiru, or advanced machines. The material and monument clauses have human actors. The stronger ancient-astronaut claim remains unproven by this source.

Sources and image credit

Daily capability improvement: apply a monument-surface firewall: when relief obscures a front inscription, require an identifier-locked exact-object copy, classify the result as exact-line-art visible and edition-guided, and never transfer clearer wedges from another face. Add an agency matrix separating divine hierarchy, human diplomacy, material movement, and monument production.

Download the evidence report: Sargon II’s Kition Stele, Anunnakū authority, and Western Sea PDF report.

One considered email each week

TheCode Weekly Evidence Brief

Receive the week’s strongest tablet decode, source audit or research update, plus one carefully chosen archive read. Routine posts stay on the site; the Brief is the curated signal.

Free. Usually sent on Sunday. No daily post flood. Unsubscribe at any time. See what the Brief includes.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

©2026 Tony Yustein

CONTACT US

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Sending

Discover more from The Code of the Ancients

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?

Official channels YouTube X / Twitter Instagram @yustein