P273204: The Anunnaki Bore Torches Aloft in the Flood Storm
Exact-photo and line-art study of K.2252+, where the Anunnaki bear torches and their brilliance makes the land glow in Gilgameš XI.

Ancient text and site reading
How to read this record
- Claim type
- Historical / textual + interpretive
- Evidence level
- Sources, translations, measurements, and symbolic reading where present
Use the evidence layer for sources and observations, and the interpretation layer for TheCode.Wiki synthesis.
Daily Anunnaki Tablet Report · 17 September 2026 UTC / 18 September Turkey time
Result: Neo-Assyrian flood-tablet witness P273204 / K.2252+ directly preserves the Anunnaki as the un-restored subject of “bore/lifted.” The object begins visibly di-pa- but its ending is restored; eBL identifies it as dipārāti, “torches.” The next line says their brilliance made the land glow. This is strong concrete-agency evidence in a literary storm scene—not evidence for spacecraft, electricity, or advanced machinery.

Download the six-page illustrated PDF report
Why this witness matters
P273204 is a real Akkadian clay tablet excavated at Nineveh (Kuyunjik), dated by CDLI to the Neo-Assyrian period, and held in the British Museum collection. The object is a checked join of five museum fragments: K.2252, K.2602, K.3321, K.4486, and Sm.1881. Modern editions conventionally call the joined manuscript K.2252+ or manuscript C of Standard Babylonian Gilgameš Tablet XI.
The famous flood narrative contains many divine names, but this passage is particularly useful for the corpus because the Anunnaki are not merely listed, praised, or placed under another god’s authority. They are the grammatical actors of a vivid carrying/lifting predicate. The next line continues with their brilliance and its effect on the land.
The result also demands restraint. This is elevated poetry inside a catastrophic storm sequence. The ordinary edition-controlled object is “torches,” and part of that word is restored in this exact witness. Nothing here describes a mechanism, fuel, vehicle, circuit, weapon, laboratory, or technical procedure.
Exact-object provenance and image-to-text alignment


The visual and textual controls do different jobs. The licensed photograph proves that the physical joined witness exists and shows extensive surviving writing. The exact copy makes the row locatable. The current electronic Babylonian Library edition controls the manuscript-specific signs, normalization, lemmata, restoration brackets, and English translation. The result is therefore row-visible and edition-guided, not an independent wedge-by-wedge reading from the photograph.
| Evidence field | Result |
|---|---|
| Image location | P273204 / K.2252+ manuscript C, column ii lines 13′–14′; standard lines XI 104–105. |
| Artifact-specific transliteration | {d}a-nun-na-ki iš-šu-u₂ di-pa-[ra-a-ti] / ina nam-ri-ir-ri-šu₂-nu u₂-ha-am-ma-ṭu m[a-a-tu₄] |
| Normalization | anunnakkū iššû dipārāti / ina namrirrīšunu uhammaṭū māta |
| Published translation | eBL: “The Anunnaki bore torches aloft, / setting the land aglow with their brilliance.” |
| Visible and un-restored | The divine name Anunnaki and iš-šu-u₂ “they bore/lifted” are wholly unbracketed. The object begins with visible di-pa-. The brilliance phrase and causative glow verb in line 105 are unbracketed. |
| Damaged / restored | ra-a-ti, the ending of dipārāti, is bracketed. The land noun is partly restored as m[a-a-tu₄]. |
| Confidence and limit | High for the Anunnaki as subject and “bore/lifted”; high but edition-guided for “torches”; high for the luminous-result clause. No independent wedge-level reading is claimed. |
Line-by-line reading
Line XI 104 / manuscript C ii 13′
{d}a-nun-na-ki iš-šu-u₂ di-pa-[ra-a-ti]
The normalized Akkadian is anunnakkū iššû dipārāti. The plural Anunnakū are the subject. Iššû, from našû, expresses bearing, carrying, or lifting. The eBL translation “bore torches aloft” captures the elevated action.
The restoration matrix matters. Neither the group name nor the verb depends on brackets. The noun begins with visible di-pa-, while its final signs are supplied. That is enough for a controlled edition to identify dipārāti, but it is not honest to call the entire object word independently visible on K.2252+.
Line XI 105 / manuscript C ii 14′
ina nam-ri-ir-ri-šu₂-nu u₂-ha-am-ma-ṭu m[a-a-tu₄]
The normalization is ina namrirrīšunu uhammaṭū māta. A cautious working translation is: “With their radiance they made the land glow.” The possessive “their” and plural verb continue the Anunnaki actors from the previous line. The brilliance phrase and causative verb are un-restored; the final land noun is only partly preserved.
The surrounding flood-storm sequence
The immediate context assigns different actions to different divine actors:
- XI 98–99: a black cloud rises and Adad bellows inside it.
- XI 100–101: Šullat and Haniš travel at the fore of the advancing storm.
- XI 102: Errakal rips out mooring poles.
- XI 103: Ninurta makes the weirs overflow.
- XI 104–105: the Anunnaki bear/lift torches and make the land glow with their brilliance.
- XI 106–111: brightness turns to gloom; gale and deluge overwhelm the land and people.
This actor ledger prevents two opposite errors. It does not transfer Errakal’s mooring-pole action or Ninurta’s weir action to the Anunnaki. It also does not erase the Anunnaki’s own explicit predicate. Their contribution is the luminous torch-bearing scene.
Anuna and Anunnaki
The name here is the Akkadian plural Anunnakū, written syllabically {d}a-nun-na-ki. It is the historical form behind the popular English label “Anunnaki.” Earlier Sumerian texts commonly use Anuna or Anunna. The forms belong to the same broad Mesopotamian divine tradition, but the continuity of the name does not license importing every modern claim into every occurrence.
For this witness the useful proposition is specific: in a Neo-Assyrian copy of the Akkadian flood epic, the Anunnaki are active plural agents whose brilliance illuminates the land during the onset of catastrophe.
Corpus relevance and the Sitchin test
P273204 advances the corpus strand on concrete Anunnaki agency and heaven-earth illumination imagery. The group is doing something consequential inside a differentiated divine operation. This is stronger for agency than a title, offering list, or passive assembly reference.
It does not prove that the torches were spacecraft, electrical lamps, directed-energy weapons, or other advanced devices. In context they belong to poetic storm imagery, often compared with destructive celestial light or lightning. The tablet offers no technical vocabulary, dimensions, components, power source, operator procedure, or machine description.
The strongest evidence-honest conclusion is therefore: Mesopotamian tradition could imagine the Anunnaki as a coordinated divine group whose carried lights make the land blaze during the flood storm. That supports organized non-human/divine agency in the literary tradition. It does not independently establish extraterrestrial identity or recoverable technology.
Daily decoding capability improvement
This run adds a predicate–object restoration matrix. Restoration is now recorded separately for grammatical subject, predicate, direct object, and result clause. When the Anunnaki subject and action are un-restored but the object ending is supplied, the subject-action pair becomes the core proposition; the object is reported with its visible onset and edition/composite control. This prevents a secure verb from silently upgrading a partly restored implement into a technological claim.
Sources
- CDLI P273204 artifact record and exact imagery
- eBL K.2252 fragment record
- eBL Standard Babylonian Gilgameš XI critical edition
- CDLI Q002873.11 composite score
- CDLI Gilgameš XI composite P481735
Evidence class: exact selected-artifact photograph plus exact-object line art; whole-row location visible; reading edition-guided; Anunnaki subject and carrying/lifting predicate un-restored; torch noun ending and land noun partly restored.
One considered email each week
TheCode Weekly Evidence Brief
Receive the week’s strongest tablet decode, source audit or research update, plus one carefully chosen archive read. Routine posts stay on the site; the Brief is the curated signal.
Free. Usually sent on Sunday. No daily post flood. Unsubscribe at any time. See what the Brief includes.
